Australia pays millions over allegedly racist scheme

 1 day agoLike|9Dua Lipa & Anwar Hadid ‘on a break’ after 2 years of datingMan who found tiny baby frog in his salad box is giving him baths and snacks

Australia’s government will pay A$2m (£1.1m; $1.4m) in compensation to hundreds of Aboriginal people who said a welfare scheme was racist.

The “work for the dole” scheme required people in remote outback communities to work up to 25 hours a week to receive income benefits.Aboriginal communities argued the welfare policy breached anti-discrimination laws© Getty Images Aboriginal communities argued the welfare policy breached anti-discrimination laws

But its strict requirements meant that many vulnerable people were pushed further into poverty, critics said.

The government settled a lawsuit but did not admit it was at fault.

Several people had struggled to survive after having their payments cut off, advocates said.

Australia controversially requires welfare recipients to record job searches and other tasks in order to receive payments.

But advocates say these requirements disadvantage Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people living in some of Australia’s poorest and most isolated communities.

Residents there have limited access to phone, internet and transport services. Many face additional language, cultural, education and health barriers.

Critics argued the Community Development Programme (CDP), introduced in 2015, was racist because it set harsher rules than other welfare schemes. Over 80% of those using the CDP were Aboriginal Australians.

A group representing 680 people in 10 communities in Western Australia sued the government, arguing the scheme breached anti-discrimination laws.

Damien McLean, president of the Shire of Ngaanyatjarraku, said locals had to travel 1,000km (620 miles) to the nearest town centres of Alice Springs or Kalgoorlie to represent themselves in person at a welfare office.

They were also required to work double the hours of those in cities and were 25 times more likely to face penalties, the Australian National University found.

The Federal Court of Australia found that people in the lawsuit had lost about A$1,800 each on average, due to the programme’s conditions.

Critics had previously described the scheme as “modern-day slavery”. People were typically paid just A$10 an hour – half the national minimum wage.

Earlier this year, the government announced it would axe the programme and introduce a new one by 2023.

Last year, it was also forced to pay a A$1.2bn settlement over a welfare policy dubbed “Robodebt” that had been ruled illegal.




Millions more Australians to be eligible for Covid booster as interval cut… The GuardianOmicron hospital risk less than Delta The GuardianHuge floating wind farms are being planned off the coast of Australia CNBCExclusive: Australia puts website accused of fake journalists on register… Reuters

Morrison government tells tribunal robodebt documents must stay secret to protect… The GuardianAustralians are at risk as too many of our leaders abdicate responsibility…The epidemic of indecision and timidity pouring out of the offices of premiers and the prime minister has turned Christmas into a game of chance for thousands of Australian families. The comforting seasonal traditions of visiting relatives or having them over for gifts and good food are being disrupted by the will-they-or-won’t-they factor. Will the Queensland/New South Wales border stay open? Why won’t governments reintroduce compulsory… The Guardian


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: logotips

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Mainīt )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: